Archive for January 9th, 2008

“Visiable minority” is racist

January 9th, 2008

I was reading through today’s Globe and Mail paper, and saw this post left by a reader.

Allan C. Hutchinson’s letter (Obama And Canada - Jan. 7) complaining about the absence of ”visible minorities” among Canada’s political elites is misguided for several reasons.First, the use of the term ”visible minority” has been condemned by the United Nations and it is time Canadians stopped using it.

Apparently the UN warned Canada last year that the term “visible minority” is a racist term. The UN believes that the term is used to discriminate against people. According to the quote above, it seems the writer thinks that distinguishing white people from racial minorities is racist. Furthermore, it doesn’t seem like he has a problem with the lack of visible minorities in Canada’s “political elites.”

I’m not entirely sure why the UN thinks visible minority is a racist term. But I’m tempted to think that the UN, like the vast majority of Canadians, view all races as being equal now, thus any racial labeling is inherently a form of discrimination — by the very act of labeling. How then can we help those that need help if we don’t even have a vocabulary to describe them?

The other 99% of Canadians

January 9th, 2008

There’s a great essay on The Globe and Mail on the inequality of incomes in Canada, written by Peter J. Nicholson. According to Statscan, the median income in Canada in 2004 is the same as it was in 1982 — taking inflation into account. Even though the economy has been grown, only the very rich Canadians are seeing significant levels of increase for their incomes.

From the article:

What happened in the late 1970s to cause the top incomes to start increasing so strongly? And why, after three decades of healthy growth in the incomes of most North Americans from 1945 through 1975, have the earnings of the great majority in both the U.S. and Canada stopped growing in pace with the overall expansion of the economy?